博士论文
当前页面: 首页 -- 论文著作
2017-宋灿灿-紧急避险车道及其配套设施系统设置技术研究

紧急避险车道及其配套设施系统

设置技术研究

Technology  for Setting Truck Escape Ramp

and  Its Facilities System

研究生:宋灿灿

指导教师:郭忠印教授

二〇一七年三月

摘要

随着山区高速公路的迅猛发展,限制性线形的比例增大,由此带来交通事故的攀升,尤以长大纵坡路段最为显著。研究表明,若采取有效的运行控制与安保措施,可显著的减少长大纵坡路段的事故。国内外改善长大纵坡路段交通安全形势的实践经验已经证明,紧急避险车道是最为有效的工程措施,因此,自紧急避险车道引入我国以来,获得了快速的发展。

然而,紧急避险车道的实际设置中仍然存在普遍性的问题,通过对国内109条紧急避险车道的设置现状分析发现,我国紧急避险车道的引道长度短、流出角度大、碎石填了制动床的长度普遍不足;制动床纵坡15%及以内,但坡度角较大;服务车道统一设置于右侧,宽度合理,制动床宽度均不低于4.5m,出现了部分超宽的紧急避险车道;紧急避险车道设置位置与定量计算方法计算得到的设置位置存在明显差异,设置于大纵坡、小半径、结构物前后的紧急避险车道比例大。

针对上述问题,本文通过驾驶模拟仿真实验技术、实地现场调研与文献数据调研的方式,对紧急避险辅助车道、引道、流出角度、服务车道、制动床纵坡、宽度、选位进行了研究。针对硬路肩不足2.5m的高速公路,根据排队论理论,建立失控车辆在不同设计速度、交通流量与路面状态下的辅助车道设置长度。引道的设置长度宜采用运行时间指标,而不宜采用设置长度指标,引道的设置长度受主线线形、流出角度、断面宽度的影响,因此,引道长度的设置值非固定值,变化范围6s~12s设计行程之间。流出角度受主线线形与横断面线形的影响,建议设置值5°~10°,条件受限时可采用5°~15°。根据对车辆行驶稳定性、SBP、操控行为特征的多因素方差分析,服务车道宜设置于制动床的左侧。采用瞳孔面积最大瞬态值进行驾驶负荷的表征,结合车辆在制动床内不发生填埋车头与下滑的力学平衡分析,确定制动床纵坡的最大值为15%。单车驶入的紧急避险车道制动床宽度不宜低于7.7m,允许两辆车先后驶入的紧急避险车道宜采用长引道、适宜制动床宽度的设置方式,通过条件概率理论建立的车辆成功驶入概率模型验证了单一的拓宽制动床宽度对于保障车辆成功驶入概率的局限性。对于紧急避险车道的选位技术,通过二阶聚类与类比的方式,验证了紧急避险车道的设置位置仅受主线平面线形的影响,与纵断面线形无关;宜设置于主线为直线与左转圆曲线路段,圆曲线半径宜不低于1000m。然后,根据运动学方程、车辆行驶稳定性与结构稳定性分析了结构物与紧急避险车道的设置间距。

然后,根据紧急避险车道安全管理系统的研究现状,提出了紧急避险车道监控应急指挥系统,对系统的框架、数据库结构、设备的需求与信息发布方式进行了设计,同时,根据现有的视频事件监测技术,融合紧急避险车道内的事件类型,通过Logistic模型建立了紧急避险车道内事件的分级标准,给予后续车辆智能引导。

最后,关于进一步工作的方向进行了简要的讨论。

 

关键词:紧急避险车道,驾驶模拟,多因素方差分析,二阶聚类,logistics,设置间距,监控系统。

ABSTRACT

With the rapid development of  mountainous expressway, the proportion of the restrictive linear increase,  which leads to the rise of traffic accidents, especially the most significant  section-the longitudinal slope. The research shows that if the effective operation  control and security measures are taken, the accidents of the longitudinal  slopes can be reduced significantly. The practical experience of improving  the traffic safety situation of longitudinal slopes at home and abroad has  proved that the truck escape ramp is the most effective engineering measure.  Therefore, since the introduction of truck escape ramp in China, it has  obtained rapid development.

However, there are still universal  problems in the actual setting of the truck escape ramp. Through the analysis  of the present 109 truck escape ramps in China, it is found that the approach  length of the truck escape ramp is short and the departure angle is large.  The length of gravel arrester bed is generally insufficient. The slop of  arrester bed is within 15% while the slop difference between the arrester bed  and mainline is large. The service lane is all on the right side of the  arrester bed, width reasonable. The minimum width of arrester bed is 4.5m,  and the maximum width is 15m, which is extra-wide. There is a significant  difference between the practical location and quantitative calculated  location of truck escape ramp. Large proportion of truck escape ramps are  located in the steep slopes, sharp curves and within the influence range of  structures such as tunnels, bridges and interchanges.

In view of the above-mentioned  problems, by driving simulation experiments, on-spot field experiments and  literature data investigation, this paper has carried on the research on the  auxiliary lane, the approach, the departure angle, service lane, the slop and  width of arrester bed, and the selection position. According to the queuing  theory, the length of auxiliary lane for errant vehicles under different  design speed, traffic flow and pavement conditions is established for the  expressway with less than 2.5m hard shoulder. The approach length should  adopt the running time index, but not the length index to indicate the  threshold. The length of the approach is influenced by the mainline  horizontal alignment, the departure angle, and the width of the  cross-section, therefore, the guide length is non-fixed value, ranging from  6s to 12s driving distance. The departure angle is influenced by the mainline  horizontal alignment and the width of the cross-section. The recommended  value is 5° ~ 10°, and 5° ~ 15° when the condition is limited. According to  the multiple factor variance analysis, the service lane should be set on the  left side of the arrester bed. Using the maximum transient velocity value of  pupil area to characterize the driving load, combining the mechanical  equilibrium analysis of the errant vehicle avoiding landfill front and  descent in the arrester bed, the maximum value of the longitudinal slope of  the arrester bed is determined to be 15%. For single errant vehicle entering  truck escape ramp, the arrester bed width should not be less than 7.7m. For  two errant vehicles entering truck escape ramp, long approach length with  suitable arrester width should be adopted. The model of the probability of  successful entry into a truck escape ramp is established by the conditional  probability theory. The results show that the widening of the brake bed has a  limitation impact on the probability of successful entry. Through the  second-order clustering and analogy method, the location of the truck escape  ramp is only affected by the horizontal alignment of the mainline, and has  nothing to do with the vertical profile. Tangent and left turn radius are the  proper position to establish truck escape ramp. And the radius should not be  less than 1000m. Then, according to the kinematic equation, vehicle driving  stability and structural stability, the distance between the structure and  the truck escape ramp is analyzed.

Then, according to the research  status of the emergency management system, the monitoring and controlling  system of the truck escape ramp is put forward. The framework, database  structure, equipment demand and information release mode are designed. At the  same time, video event monitoring technology, which integrates with the types  of events in the truck escape ramp, the grading standard of the events in the  truck escape ramp is established by Logistic model, and gives the follow-up  vehicle intelligent guidance.

In the finality, the problems  requiring further studies are discussed.

 

Key Words: truck escape  ramp, driving simulation, multiple factor variance analysis, two-step  cluster, logistics, setting separation distance, monitoring system.

 

网站邮箱:guogroup@tjroad.com
2010郭忠印教授课题组 版权所有  技术支持:维程互联